Crypto Fails to Participate as Strategy Supply Overhang Persists, Circle’s Growth Assumptions Deserve a Reset (Portfolio Rebalance)

Crypto Fails to Participate as Strategy Supply Overhang Persists, Circle’s Growth Assumptions Deserve a Reset (Portfolio Rebalance)
  • Crypto Reverses Despite Strength in Tech: Crypto gave back most of yesterday’s gains today, with the selloff beginning overnight and continuing into the U.S. session. The inability for the market to stage a rebound on a day when QQQ and SPX were both higher, suggests the Strategy-related supply overhang remains a meaningful drag on both sentiment and flows.
  • Strategy Supply Overhang Still Weighing on BTC: Yesterday’s Strategy 8-K formalized BTC as a potential funding source for balance sheet repair, preferred dividends, and repurchases. While the removal of acute recursive tail risk was positive, the market now has to digest the possibility that Strategy becomes a source of BTC supply rather than incremental demand in the near term. This does not mean BTC necessarily needs to move materially lower, but it does help explain why investors may be reluctant to step in aggressively ahead of potential supply. The good news is that STRC traded higher today. The higher this trades the closer MSTR’s balanced sheet is to being “repaired.”
  • JOLTS Is a Point for the Hawks, But Labor Market Still Mixed: Today’s JOLTS report came in above expectations, which is a good sign for the economy and incrementally hawkish ahead of Thursday’s payrolls report. That said, I think the broader labor market picture remains mixed. Hires have not meaningfully accelerated alongside the rebound in openings, layoffs remain subdued, and job openings per unemployed worker remain near 1. Still, for rates markets, the headline JOLTS beat is marginally hawkish.
  • OpenUSD Creates a New Competitive Threat for Circle: The most important company-specific development today was the launch announcement of Open USD  (OUSD), a consortium-backed stablecoin designed for global money movement. The product is built around several features that directly challenge Circle’s model: no fees to mint or redeem, distribution of reserve income to participating partners, and governance by the consortium itself. The partner list includes several major technology, fintech, and crypto firms, creating meaningful built-in distribution if execution proves successful.
  • Circle’s Growth Assumptions Now Deserve a Reset: Circle’s valuation remains highly sensitive to long-term USDC growth assumptions. Management’s implied 40% CAGR target already required a fairly optimistic view of stablecoin adoption and Circle’s ability to capture that growth. OpenUSD does not need to win the entire market to matter. It only needs to reduce confidence in Circle’s ability to maintain share and economics. That is particularly important because the emergence of a zero-fee, reserve-sharing consortium model calls into question whether a pure-play stablecoin issuer can sustain attractive public-market economics over time.
  • Execution Risk Exists, But Risk/Reward Has Deteriorated: To be clear, Open USD has not launched yet, and consortium models carry real execution risk. Circle still has meaningful advantages, including liquidity, distribution, DeFi integration, and brand trust. However, the risk/reward has become less compelling. The stock may retain optionality tied to agentic payments and AI-native settlement, but several OpenUSD consortium members are likely pursuing similar offerings. As a result, I am removing CRCL from the crypto equities portfolio for now while keeping it on the watch list.
  • Portfolio Changes: Within the crypto equities portfolio, I removed CRCL and raised cash to just over 50%. Given the divergence between the equity portfolio’s cash allocation and the token portfolio, as well as the continued flow-related headwinds discussed above, I also reduced BTC exposure by 5% and moved those proceeds into USDC. This brings the token portfolio back to roughly 50% cash and better aligns risk exposure across both portfolios.
  • Bottom Line: Crypto’s failure to participate in today’s tech-led rally supports the idea that Strategy-related supply concerns remain a meaningful near-term headwind. OpenUSD also materially complicates Circle’s long-term competitive outlook and, in my view, warrants a more conservative stance on the stock until its competitive impact becomes clearer. As we enter a new quarter, I continue to think patience remains the appropriate posture. Maintaining additional dry powder across both portfolios should leave us well-positioned to capitalize on opportunities as they arise.
Crypto Fails to Participate as Strategy Supply Overhang Persists, Circle’s Growth Assumptions Deserve a Reset (Portfolio Rebalance)
Source: Artemis, Bloomberg, Fundstrat
Crypto Fails to Participate as Strategy Supply Overhang Persists, Circle’s Growth Assumptions Deserve a Reset (Portfolio Rebalance)
Source: Artemis, Bloomberg, Fundstrat

Tickers in this video: BTC 0.70% USDC -0.01% STRC MSTR CRCL QQQ ^SPX

PS: If you are enjoying our service and its evidence-based approach, please leave us a positive 5-star review on Google reviews —> Click here.

Disclosures (show)